Paul Manafort shouldn’t be held under house arrest, his attorneys argued in a court filing Thursday.
The $10 million unsecured bond — money Manafort would only pay if he disappeared or violated the court’s orders — should be enough of a measure until he goes to trial, they say. Since his arrest Monday, he has not been allowed to leave his home in Alexandria, Virginia, except for medical and religious reasons and to meet with his attorney and appear in court.
“Given the substantial media coverage surrounding Mr. Manafort and this investigation, it is fair to say that he is one of the most recognizable people on the planet today. Query where such an individual could even hide?” Manafort’s defense lawyers asked.
Federal prosecutors say that Manafort, 68, may flee the country because of his “history of deception,” and the amount of foreign travel and his millions of dollars held in foreign bank accounts.
Among other things, prosecutors have noted that Manafort has three US passports with different numbers and traveled abroad recently while using a phone and email registered under an alias.
But Manafort’s defense attorneys, Kevin Downing and Thomas Zehnle, say that “Mr. Manafort is not a danger to the community.” They claim he has strong family ties in the US, including a wife of almost 40 years, two daughters and children, and his assets are mostly in the US.
The filing also notes that Manafort’s work for Ukrainian political clients ended in 2014 — two years before he began to work as a top adviser on the Trump presidential campaign.
“The weight of the evidence outlined against Mr. Manafort has also been embellished,” Manafort’s filing says.
“As a US citizen, Mr. Manafort only has US passports in his name. Although it might be surprising to some, it is perfectly permissible to have more than one US passport, as individuals who travel abroad extensively no doubt know,” they wrote. Manafort’s lawyers also dispute the federal prosecutors’ suspicion of his bank accounts in Cyprus, saying that money came from “legal sources” and he now has either closed those accounts or keeps “nominal” amounts of money in them.
Manafort’s filing Thursday also adds that he and his former lawyer learned from federal prosecutors in August that he’d face an indictment. He hadn’t fled the country since then, and even traveled abroad between August and his October 30 arrest.
Manafort and co-defendant Rick Gates are scheduled to be in court Thursday afternoon for the judge to take up the house arrest issue, and to review the timing of a trial.
Both have pleaded not guilty.
In another filing Thursday morning, federal prosecutors asked for a restraining order so Manafort can’t change a life insurance policy that he and his wife Kathleen hold through Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company. Federal prosecutors also asked for information about the value of the Manaforts’ life insurance policies. The policy is part of what Manafort could forfeit to the government if convicted.
New attorneys for Gates
Gates hired two private attorneys to argue for him in court, now that he faces eight federal charges resulting from the Mueller investigation.
The attorneys are Walter Mack of New York City and Shan Wu of Washington.
Previously, Gates was represented by a different Washington-based lawyer, Michael Dry. But Dry didn’t appear in court when Gates first went before a judge after he was arrested that morning. On Monday, a public defender, normally reserved for a less affluent defendant, spoke on his behalf.
Wu will appear with Gates in court Thursday, a press release said.
Judge appointed by Obama, sentenced Jesse Jackson Jr.
Manafort and Gates will appear Thursday before federal District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, who will continue to hear their case as it moves toward a trial. Berman Jackson earned Senate confirmation in 2011 after being appointed by former President Barack Obama. Among several notable cases, she sentenced former US Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. to two and a half years in prison after he was convicted of corruption, and she gave his wife a one-year sentence.
In that case, Berman Jackson was keen to point out the nature of crime and punishment, especially in cases against public officials.
“If I imposed a sentence that included no incarceration at all in this case, what message would that send? It would be read one way and one way only, as a clear statement that there are two systems of justice: one for the well-connected and one for everyone else,” she said when sentencing the Jacksons. “I cannot do it. I will not do it.”